Resolves YES if Sokolowski v. Digital Currency Group, Inc., 4:25-cv-00001, (M.D. Penn.) survives defendants' motion to dismiss (e.g., 12(b)(6) or a bankruptcy related motion), In the event that such a motion is granted in part, I will resolve to a % based off of the number of defendants and claims remaining (e.g., a MTD which results in the dismissal of 2 of 3 parties will result in a 33% resolution).
Resolves NO if a motion is granted in full; or plaintiffs dismiss the suit with or without prejudice prior to the last deadline for defendants to file such a motion.
The docket can be found here (or on PACER here). A copy of the original complaint can be found here.
The MTD by defendants Silbert and DCG (ECF 16) is available here. (Mooted by amended complaint but should represent closely the pending brief on renewed MTD)
1,000
3.00
@FrederickNorris Sadly it seems Steve asked for more time to do his homework (ECF 40, asking for an extension until May 27).
@KevinBlaw I doubt that the Sokos have the $.75M to disgorge. They are really playing with fire in more ways that one.
@KevinBlaw Kevin I would happily sell you a swap on that event if I thought doing such a thing was easily legally consummated.
@FrederickNorris I skimmed the complaint. It seems deficient in the same ways as the original but I believe any amended complaint in the 3rd circuit moots motions to dismiss.
Only 2602 more hours to go until AI figures out a way to create a sham entity that recovers money through an assignment in bankruptcy court and then allows you do double dip individually and collect money again by suing. Everyone is about to get two times richer (except for the people who will necessarily get two times poorer). Awe-inspiring.
@KevinBlaw Talk about running through the tape, he will be working on this brief for a full 12 days after it was already due!
