Will prioritizing corrigible AI produce safe results?
3
Ṁ1602050
45%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
This market is conditional on the market "Will the company that produces the first AGI have prioritized Corrigibility?" (https://manifold.markets/PeterMcCluskey/will-the-company-that-produces-the). This market will resolve as N/A if that market resolves as NO or N/A.
If that market resolves as YES, this market will resolve one year later, to the same result that the market "Will AGI create a consensus among experts on how to safely increase AI capabilities?" (https://manifold.markets/PeterMcCluskey/will-agi-create-a-consensus-among-e) is resolved as.
I will not trade in this market.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
Is slowing down AGI good for AI safety? [resolves to poll]
83% chance
Is RLHF good for AI safety? [resolves to poll]
45% chance
Will Anthropic be the best on AI safety among major AI labs at the end of 2025?
84% chance
Will AGI create a consensus among experts on how to safely increase AI capabilities?
31% chance
By 2027 will there be a well-accepted training procedure(s) for making AI honest?
15% chance
Will I still consider improving AI X-Safety my top priority on EOY 2024?
73% chance
Will AI be considered safe in 2030? (resolves to poll)
72% chance
How much should society prioritize AI safety research, relative to how much it is currently prioritized?
POLL
Will the ARC Prize Foundation succeed at making a new benchmark that is easy for humans but still hard for the best AIs?
82% chance
AI honesty #2: by 2027 will we have a reasonable outer alignment procedure for training honest AI?
25% chance